
JUPITER: Rosuvastatin reduces events in patients without hyperlipidemia but with elevated hsCRP
“While current guidelines for the prevention of heart attack, stroke, and cardiovascular death endorse statins in patients with established vascular disease, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia, the tension in the field is that these treatment strategies are insufficient because the mantra is that half of all heart attacks and strokes that do occur are among individuals who simply don’t have overt hyperlipidemia,” says Dr. Ridker, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Braunwald Professor of Medicine at Harvard Medical School, Boston. While many physicians try to improve identifying high-risk individuals by measuring hsCRP, a strategy of treating patients without established cardiovascular risk factors with statins remains controversial. “Trial results are often overlooked, and implementation would have to occur in family practice, and that is, indeed, where these patients were recruited,” says Andrew M. Tonkin, MD, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia. “Ultimately, if we see hsCRP is something to base treatment on, who do you screen?” Dr. Tonkin also points out that JUPITER patients did have other risks in that they were overweight and had a median systolic blood pressure of 134 mmHg. In a statement issued today, American Heart Association president Timothy Gardner, MD, said, “(JUPITER) was not designed to answer the question of whether the impact on risk was due to a reduction in inflammation or a reduction in LDL. Statins lower both LDL cholesterol and hsCRP. Thus the findings presented today cannot determine whether lowering cholesterol, reducing inflammation, or a combination of both is responsible for the effects seen in this paper.” In 2003, the AHA and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention concluded that hsCRP, at physician discretion, may be useful to determine the preventive measures needed for people at intermediate risk. Trial Results Primary endpoint events were significantly reduced among rosuvastatin patients (HR 0.56, p<0.00001). Rates of hospitalization and revascularization were reduced by 47% within a 2-year period, suggesting that the hsCRP screening and treatment strategy used in JUPITER is cost-effective, Dr. Ridker explains. He adds that a number-needed-to-treat analysis indicated that 25 patients without traditional cardiovascular risk factors but with elevated hsCRP would require rosuvastatin treatment over 5 years to prevent one death. “When used for 5 years, this treatment strategy could conservatively prevent 250,000 first events,” he says. Dr. Tonkin, however, says, “The importance of intervention for individuals being treated and for public health policy depends on the absolute risk reduction, not the relative risk reduction.” According to Dr. Tonkin, for example, the 20% relative risk reduction seen with rosuvastatin treatment in individuals with elevated hsCRP alone translates to a 0.055% absolute risk reduction. “We would need to treat 190 people over the course of the study to prevent one death,” he says. Women and Minorities “The trial had 26 prespecified subgroups, and the key is that all of them reached statistical significance on their own. Women are receiving the same benefit from rosuvastatin as men, and the results are very reassuring for minority patients,” says Dr. Ridker. There was no significant difference between effect in women versus men, those age 65 and older compared with younger patients, smokers versus nonsmokers, Caucasians versus minorities, or between those with elevated hsCRP alone and those with other risk factors, Dr. Ridker reports. Safety Results However, Dr. Tonkin questions the short, 2-year duration of the trial. “While we have an enormous amount of data for statins as a class, showing no increased cancer risk, to detect a signal for solid organ cancers, one needs at least 5 years, up to 20 years of exposure,” he says. As for other adverse events, there was a nominally significant increase in hemoglobin A1c among rosuvastatin patients at 24 months (5.9% versus 5.8%; p=.01). There was also a marginally significant increase in physician-reported, incident diabetes among patients in the rosuvastatin group (p=.02). There were no differences between active treatment and placebo patients in the occurrence of muscle weakness, myopathy, rhabdomyolysis, hemorrhagic stroke, fasting glucose levels, or glucosuria. Disclaimer This information has been independently developed and provided by the editors of Modern Medicine Primary Care Content Group. The sponsor does not endorse and is not responsible for the accuracy of the content, or for practices or standards of non-sponsor sources. These articles may discuss regimens that have not been approved by the FDA. For full prescribing information including indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and adverse experiences please see the appropriate manufacturer's product circular.
| ![]() Stay Connected to Geriatrics • Current Issue • Issue Archive • Subscribe to Enewsletter • Subscribe to Print Edition • Subscribe to Digital Edition • Geriatrics Radio Coding Counselor Simple and accurate ICD-9 code search. Start Here Patient Education Print customized patient education handouts. Start Here Surgical Video Center On-demand surgery demos and presentations. Start Here ![]() ![]() Featured Jobs |